I've been working on a deck for the Gazelle
![Ship :ship](./images/smilies/ship.png)
, just been playing the "SCN 1: Alone in the dark" a few times to work out the kinks. It's an interesting ship. The capacity of
![Passenger/Military :passengermilitary](./images/smilies/passengermilitary.png)
make it rough when filling contracts. I find I need a decent amount of
![Event :event](./images/smilies/event.png)
like Pretty Penny and
![Connection :connection](./images/smilies/connection.png)
like Free Trader Network to help fill in the gaps. There are just too few
![Contract :contract](./images/smilies/contract.png)
and
![Complication :complication](./images/smilies/complication.png)
that are
![Military :military](./images/smilies/military.png)
that I find most of the
![Contract :contract](./images/smilies/contract.png)
on the table I have to get something my ship doesn't have. I may play around with the
![Contract :contract](./images/smilies/contract.png)
/
![Complication :complication](./images/smilies/complication.png)
cards more for this deck.
Oh and the Rhal'Kais Corairs
![Complication :complication](./images/smilies/complication.png)
is a killer!! I had to toss my entire hand a few times ACK! It might be a bit much. If you're open to change on this one I'd recommend "...randomly discard half (rounded up) of all cards with
![Expense Value :ev](./images/smilies/EV.png)
of 1". That would still be pretty rough more often than not. I know that this was supposed to "hurt" more than the Luxury Tax
![Complication :complication](./images/smilies/complication.png)
, and it sure does, I think it's a bit over the top.
- Ric
![Ship :ship](./images/smilies/ship.png)